Bridgewater House UK director Matthew Sixsmith can not hold senior roles in financial services industry

The FSA has banned the director of a Manchester based mortgage and general insurance firm from holding senior positions in the financial services industry after his failure to comply with client money rules resulted in the loss of approximately £85,000 of his customers’ money.

Matthew Sixsmith was the director of Bridgewater House UK, which dealt mainly in the sub prime mortgage market, but also arranged life and critical illness insurance in connection with those mortgages.

When Bridgewater sold an insurance policy, it would charge its customers two years’ insurance premiums upfront, and then add this amount to the mortgage. The firm agreed with its customers that it would hold this money and then pay the insurance premiums to insurers on their behalf.

However, the FSA claims Sixsmith failed to separate his customers’ money from that of the firm, and used only one bank account under the name of Bridgewater to administer both his business and the premium payments customers had entrusted to him. As a result, when Sixsmith’s firm ceased trading in September last year, approximately £85,000 of customers’ money was lost.

As Bridgewater’s sole director, it was also Sixsmith’s responsibility to ensure that any insurance premiums that customers had lodged with the firm were passed on to the insurers when payments became due. However, approximately 700 policies lapsed because, until May 2008, Sixsmith kept no record of when these payments should begin or end for each of the firm’s customers and therefore he failed to ensure that premiums were paid when due.

The FSA said Sixsmith failed to take reasonable steps to ensure his business complied with the FSA’s regulations, and therefore breached Statement of Principle 7. He also failed to ensure that adequate systems and controls were in place to safeguard the firm’s client money.

Margaret Cole, director, enforcement said: “Sixsmith was incompetent and his actions posed serious risks to customers who trusted him with their money and expected him to pass that money on to insurers.

“Individuals who look after client money must act in accordance with the rules. Where they fail to comply, we will not hesitate to take enforcement action against them.”

The FSA said it would have imposed a £25,000 penalty, but this would have placed Sixsmith in serious financial hardship.