Risk surveying is the latest tool insurers are using to assess employers' liability risks. But how effective is it? Sue Copeman reports
Employers' liability premium rates will continue to climb. Even 'good' risks are likely to face increases of 25% at next renewal, according to insurers. Those in hazardous areas or with a poor claims record can expect a much greater hike.So how can companies contain their EL costs and differentiate themselves from their peers? Improving risk management is vital. Over past months, more risk surveys have been touted as an answer , but do they really work?The principal is sound. Providing comprehensive and transparent information is the key initial step for companies seeking the best response from their EL insurers. Such information should cover:
Effective processesPolicyholders are generally changing their attitude towards health and safety surveys. In the past, some businesses viewed health and safety legislation as an obstacle to entrepreneurism, but they are now becoming far more sensitive to the need for effective processes.According to AIG Europe UK primary casualty manager Paul Baynham, many health and safety officers who have good risk management in place are pleased for the opportunity to demonstrate this, particularly if they consider their efforts are insufficiently recognised within the organisation itself. "They can use our casualty report as a means of putting leverage on their own business," he says. "Reports can put pressure on senior management to get the health and safety issue off the shop floor by identifying weaknesses and raising awareness."David Smith, head of market management for Zurich Financial Services' UK commercial business, stresses that EL centres around people rather than premises. "Health and safety surveys are very much about making sure businesses start to address the culture within the business rather than just satisfying the basics."And senior management buy-in is a good indicator of how seriously a business takes its health and safety responsibilities.Smith says that increasingly inspections start with a strategic health and safety meeting with the senior management of the company. "We're not just looking at aspects such as how they document things, but also their inherent approach and how they value health and safety within the company."Bell agrees that a critical aspect is the management's commitment and approach to health and safety - "not just lip service but what happens in practice".
Training recordsApart from the obvious issue of compliance with health and safety regulations, what else do insurers' health and safety surveyors look for? Baynham says documentation is important. For example, surveyors will wish to see businesses keeping good training records as these could be essential in defending a claim.In engineering and manufacturing risks, surveyors will also be concerned to identify situations which could increase vulnerability to claims from the most common causes: slips and trips; people falling from height; objects falling from height on to people; and use of electrical and transport equipment.Inspectors will look for signs of drug and alcohol abuse too, particularly for safety critical work. Stress can be an issue in the services sector and, according to Baynham, inspectors need to spot the telltale signs. Where a company has recently gone through significant change, such as a merger or substantial re-organisation, it might be expected to have stress management processes in place. Stress can also be an issue in professional firms that have cultures of long hours, tight deadlines, and a competitive internal environment.While surveys help underwriters distinguish between well and poorly-managed risks and make better informed decisions, insurers generally agree that they also produce real benefits for the businesses concerned.Following a survey, insurers will provide feedback to the organisation concerned. This can range from requirements to make the risk safe and acceptable with a timetable for taking the necessary action, to recommendations for improving safety performance. Good health and safety does not have to cost a lot of money; insurers' surveyors are generally aware of the financial constraints facing many businesses. Bell gives the example of an abbatoir where employees were suffering from repetitive strain injury. "Our surveyor advised them to use sharper knives. It eliminated the problem and also increased productivity."Baynham believes that a regular inspection programme provides a good opportunity to update clients, for example on new legislation or the implications of any changes to their operations. It also draws management attention to the need to evaluate risk systematically. "We aim to work in partnership with our liability policyholders so a good rapport between client and risk engineer is essential."Says David Smith: "What we can't do is to change the culture. All we can do is suggest improvements to the health and safety management culture in the business, and hope they take it on board. It helps us and also helps the business."