However, insurers claim that there ‘is no justification for engineering contractual wording to accommodate unique circumstances which have occurred subsequently’
For the first time in its short history last week, the Supreme Court considered the details of business interruption (BI) insurance.
The trigger for the four-day virtual hearing was the swathe of appeals mounted against the High Court’s ruling in September on the landmark BI test case brought by the FCA.
“Probably the most important insurance decision of the last decade and a decision of substantial importance to many thousands of businesses” is how the FCA billed the High Court’s judgement in the documents outlining its case for last week’s hearing.
This article is usually available exclusively to subscribers.
For a limited period, you can enjoy all the benefits of an online subscription free for 14 days. Sign up now to read this article in full and to enjoy unlimited access to premium online content, a digital edition of the latest issue, plus an online archive of back issues.
Also, as a registered user, you will be able to -