FCA called out as ‘shining example of regulatory intervention’ for test case action

fireworks

Despite being celebrated as a policyholder victory, many legal professionals feel this reaction to the test case verdict could be ‘premature’ as the likelihood of an appeal from insurers still looms large

Legal professionals are applauding the FCA’s prompt response to the conflict between insurers and policyholders surrounding Covid-19-related business interruption (BI) claims as the High Court yesterday published its verdict on the eight-day test case that sought to clarify non-damage BI policy wordings and their interpretation.

For example, Michael Frisby, dispute resolution partner at Stevens and Bolton, described the regulator and its unprecedented High Court test case as a “a shining example of regulatory intervention, addressing key legal issues in a divided market”.

Read more…

You need to register to continue reading the rest of this article and more for free.
(If you’re already registered, please sign in here.)

REGISTER NOW FOR FREE

We’re glad you’ve chosen Insurance Times as your source for industry news and hope you’ve been enjoying reading articles from our award-winning team of journalists.

Gain access to more of our exclusive, breaking stories, interviews and news analysis as it happens. Registering is quick, easy, free, and will also have the additional benefits:

  • Uncover Secrets: Dive deep with exclusive annual reports, fueled by expert insights.
  • News That Matters: Award-winning coverage & analysis, delivered to your inbox.
  • Stay Ahead, Your Way: Daily or weekly - choose your news rhythm.
  • Own Your Learning: Curate your knowledge with a personalized library.

Stay on top of the insurance game with our subscription! Get unlimited access to over 80,000 articles, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports by industry experts, and our Five-Star rating system to compare companies and find the best fit for your business needs - view subscription options.