As a high street claimant lawyer, while I agree with the sentiment and much of the content of Andy Cook's article (23 September, Insurance Times) can I take issue with the sub editor who wrote the headline - "Lawyers in fees abuse".

Most road accident claimants are now directed to solicitors by before-the-event insurers, many of whom are also liability insurers. Solicitors set up on each side sheds full of half trained hyperagressive paralegals to wage aggressive costs wars against themselves . What do you expect?

Most of us left on the high street would generally make the call to remind liability insurers and give them a day or two to put the cheque in the post.

My perception, however, is that the gap between the two sides of our industry is steadily widening.

I tried to get a liability insurer to talk to its own legal expenses division to settle a costs argument the other day, but even in the same organisation they wouldn't talk to each other.

Can I suggest the headline "Send more work to the high street - we're cheaper and better quality." or possibly "High street lawyers deliver better service than claims factories". We're still open for business (just about).

Andrew Sharpe
Penmans Solictors
Coventry

Insurance Times Fantasy Football

Topics