Daniel Bentley - Parliamentary Correspondent
The government has been forced to remove controversial proposals to allow trial without jury in complex fraud cases from a Bill aimed at simplifying fraud prosecutions.
The move was to avoid delaying the whole package of anti-fraud measures contained in the Fraud Bill, which includes a single offence of fraud.
The Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, revealed that a new Bill would be introduced at a later date to deal exclusively with the implementation of Section 43 of the Criminal Justice Act.
This would allow judges to sit without a jury for what Lord Goldsmith insists would be a "small number" of complex fraud cases.
His decision to decouple the proposal for non-jury trials from the Fraud Bill is a tacit admission that the government faces serious difficulties in getting the measure through Parliament.
Lord Goldsmith said: "It is clear that there is no immediate prospect of those discussions bearing fruit and leading to a compromise position which delivers the necessary improvements to the efficacy of fraud trials.
"In those circumstances, it cannot be right to delay this modest but desirable [Fraud] Bill any longer."
A new Bill implementing Section 43 would be brought forward "as soon as Parliamentary time allows", he said.
But if the House of Lords - where the government has no majority - remains steadfast in its opposition, the legislation could be held up for as long as two years.
It's the perfect way to acknowledge hard work, inspire your team, and network with industry leaders.
Crucially, as many of our attendees have done before, you can use your table booking as the perfect, hassle-free Team Christmas Party, combining prestige, celebration, and a memorable night they'll talk about all year!
