The recovery of underwriting profitability in the UK. motor insurance market suffered a blow in 2003 as improvements in underlying profits stalled, threatening an end to the current hard market.
Despite apparent improvements in the underwriting profitability of the U.K. motor insurance market in 2003, rate increases were not sufficient for it to maintain the underlying results seen in 2002. The results threaten a turn in the market cycle, at a time when its current level of profitability can only be considered 'adequate'.
The headline net combined ratio (a key indicator of underwriting profitability) for UK companies writing motor business - excluding Lloyd's - strengthened slightly to 101% in 2003 from 102% in 2002.
However, the underlying current year combined ratio (which excludes adjustments to prior years' reserves) weakened, rising to 101% in 2003 from 100% in 2002, with claims costs running ahead of premium increases.
The results for comprehensive insurance on private cars saw the first deterioration in the gross claims ratio for five years, rising by two percentage points, despite an increase in the average premium earned per car to £378 from £368. However, the average claims cost increased by 6% from £1,608 to £1,710 and this was only partly offset by a very slight fall in accident frequency.
The second-largest class of business, motor fleet, also saw its gross loss ratio deteriorate five percentage points, from 67% to 72%. For fleet business, premium per vehicle remained virtually unchanged at £695 compared with £692 in 2002, but average claims costs increased by almost 16% to £2,261 from £1,956. It was only a two percentage point reduction in claims frequency to 22% that prevented the deterioration being worse.
The prospect of deteriorating underwriting results is disappointing for the market, which has accumulated underwriting losses of £6.5bn over the past 10 years, and recorded an average combined ratio of 109%.
Standard & Poor's estimates that companies can currently incur a combined ratio of up to 103% and still make an adequate return on capital. But, although results have varied widely across companies, in aggregate the market has only achieved these levels for the past two years and may be hard pressed to achieve this in 2004.
UK insurance companies together wrote gross motor insurance premiums of £11.9bn in 2003, with a further £1.1bn written by Lloyd's syndicates.
- David Laxton is a director of Standard & Poor's
For more information please contact client services on 44 20 7176 7176 or email email@example.com
STANDARD & POOR'S INSURER FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATING DEFINITIONS
An insurer rated BBB or higher is regarded as having financial security characteristics that outweigh any vulnerabilities and is highly likely to have the ability to meet financial commitments.
AAA: An insurer rated AAA has EXTREMELY STRONG financial security characteristics AAA is the highest insurer financial strength rating assigned by Standard & Poor's
AA: An insurer rated AA has VERY STRONG financial security characteristics, differing only slightly from those rated higher
A: An insurer rated A has STRONG financial security characteristics, but is somewhat more likely to be affected by adverse business conditions than are insurers with higher ratings
BBB: An insurer rated BBB has GOOD financial security characteristics, but is more likely to be affected by adverse business conditions than are higher rated insurers.
An insurer rated BB or lower is regarded as having vulnerable characteristics that may outweigh its strengths. BB indicates the least degree of vulnerability within the range, CC the highest.
BB: An insurer rated BB has MARGINAL financial security characteristics.
Positive attributes exist, but adverse business conditions could lead to insufficient ability to meet financial commitments.
B: An insurer rated B has WEAK financial security characteristics. Adverse business conditions are likely to impair its ability to meet financial commitments.
CCC: An insurer rated CCC has VERY WEAK financial security characteristics, and is dependent on favourable business conditions to meet financial commitments.
CC: An insurer rated CC has EXTREMELY WEAK financial security characteristics and is not likely to meet some of its financial commitments.
R: An insurer rated R has experienced a REGULATORY ACTION regarding solvency. The rating does not apply to insurers subject only to non-financial actions such as market conduct violations.
NR: An insurer designated NR is NOT RATED, which implies no opinion about the insurer's financial security.
Plus (+) or minus (-) signs following ratings from AA to CCC show relative standing within the major rating categories.
The next to a company's rating in the list means that this company is a Standard & Poor's Security Circle Insurer. Security Circle insurers voluntarily underwent Standard & Poor's most comprehensive review and have achieved one of its four top rating categories. In addition, the company has agreed to co-operate with Standard & Poor's ongoing monitoring of its financial condition.
'Pi' ratings, denoted with a 'pi' subscript, are insurer financial strength ratings based on an analysis of published financial information and additional information in the public domain. They do not reflect in-depth meetings with an insurer's management and are therefore based on less comprehensive information than ratings without a 'pi' subscript. 'Pi' ratings are reviewed annually based on a new year's financial statements, but may be reviewed on an interim basis if a major event occurs that may affect an insurer's financial security. 'Pi' ratings are not subject to potential CreditWatch listings.