Was scratching out required pet damage insurance from Renters’ Rights Act a missed opportunity?

pet damage

With the Renters’ Rights Act coming into force last month, the decision to drop the clause that allowed landlords to require tenants hold pet damage insurance has come under fire, with a managing director branding it a ‘retrograde step for landlords and tenants alike’

On 27 October, it was announced that the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 was granted Royal Assent – legally laying down greater rights for tenants in England.

Read more…

Explore more personal lines related content here, or discover more news analysis stories here

You need to register to continue reading the rest of this article and more for free.
(If you’re already registered, please sign in here.)

REGISTER NOW FOR FREE

We’re glad you’ve chosen Insurance Times as your source for industry news and hope you’ve been enjoying reading articles from our award-winning team of journalists.

Gain access to more of our exclusive, breaking stories, interviews and news analysis as it happens. Registering is quick, easy, free, and will also have the additional benefits:

  • Uncover Secrets: Dive deep with exclusive annual reports, fueled by expert insights.
  • News That Matters: Award-winning coverage & analysis, delivered to your inbox.
  • Stay Ahead, Your Way: Daily or weekly - choose your news rhythm.
  • Own Your Learning: Curate your knowledge with a personalized library.

Stay on top of the insurance game with our subscription! Get unlimited access to over 80,000 articles, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports by industry experts, and our Five-Star rating system to compare companies and find the best fit for your business needs - view subscription options.